CoreDNA.

HR OVERVIEW / LINKED UHR DETAIL / REAL DATA

CoreDNA log & image viewer.

The supplied strength track is reported in MPa. Its calibration and the exact strength property are not specified in this demonstration export; do not treat it as a direct unconfined compressive-strength test. Grain-size indices and cluster classifications are derived interpretations.

Approved HR and UHR imagery with measurements and derived tracks from the same supplied interval. The vertical scale is distance from the start of this 96.8 cm excerpt, not well depth. Original depths and identifiers are omitted. Each track retains its own sampling positions and missing values. Alignment follows the supplied matched-image interval, not an independent pixel-level calibration.

FOCUS ON THE INTERVAL

38.4–58.4 cm

View length20 cm · detailed40 cm · contextFull interval

← PreviousNext →

Choose tracks Measurements, grain size, geochemistry and interpretation

Report-style grouping: grain-size percentiles share a scale; each XRF curve has its own labelled scale. Cluster IDs use discrete markers and a colour strip, not a continuous curve.

Move along the core with the slider or interval buttons. The image and tracks share the same visible interval. Scroll sideways for additional tracks; point at a track to inspect its readings. Curves retain source units; indices and cluster IDs are derived outputs, not direct mineral measurements.

Core image
Distance along core (cm)

Strength

Strength (MPa)

090180

Grain size

P05 GSD (µm)

015003000

P50 GSD (µm)

015003000

P95 GSD (µm)

015003000

XRF · Fe / Ca / Al

XRF · Fe (%)

017.535

XRF · Ca (%)

01530

XRF · Al (%)

0510

XRF · Rb / K / Mn

XRF · Rb (ppm)

0150300

XRF · K (%)

0510

XRF · Mn (ppm)

015003000

XRF · Sr / Si / S

XRF · Sr (ppm)

07501500

XRF · Si (%)

02040

XRF · S (%)

01530

Vp (5 cm)

Vp (5 cm) (ft/s)

0500010000

Vs (5 cm)

Vs (5 cm) (ft/s)

030006000

Dynamic Poisson ratio

Dynamic Poisson ratio (ratio)

-0.500.5

Cluster ID

Cluster ID (category)

02.55

Cluster key (categorical, not ranked): ID 0ID 1ID 2ID 3ID 4ID 5. Colours identify categories only; no lithology names are assigned.

SELECTED INTERVAL

Distance along core 48.4 cm

UHR DETAIL · 1 CM WINDOW

Mechanical

Strength

— MPa

Derived grain size

P05 GSD

— µm

P50 GSD

— µm

P95 GSD

— µm

Classification

Cluster ID

—

Additional readings Elemental composition, acoustics & image indices

Derived image indices

Elemental

XRF · Si

— %

XRF · Al

— %

XRF · Ca

— %

XRF · Fe

— %

XRF · K

— %

XRF · S

— %

XRF · Mn

— ppm

XRF · Rb

— ppm

XRF · Sr

— ppm

Acoustics

Vp (5 cm)

— ft/s

Vs (5 cm)

— ft/s

Dynamic Poisson ratio

—

Nearest readings within half each track’s sampling step. Missing or distant readings are shown as unavailable; values are not interpolated.

Imagery in a measurement workflow

CoreDNA brings imagery together with selected measurements of rock strength, elemental composition and other physical properties. Aligning these observations helps guide sampling. A narrow dry-machined surface provides access for measurements before plugging and slabbing; this preparation removes some material and is agreed as part of the programme.

Additional analysis and reporting

An interpretation programme can extend the measurement package with the following outputs, selected to suit the available data and project objectives:

• Rock grouping: statistical clustering of selected strength, grain-size and elemental measurements to highlight intervals with similar responses and support sampling decisions.
• Elemental cross-plots: comparisons between measured chemical components to explore compositional differences between groups.
• Modelled mineralogy: estimates derived from elemental data, with assumptions documented and suitable XRD reference measurements used for calibration where available.
• Integrated logs and exports: aligned measurement and interpretation tracks, with LAS or CSV delivery agreed for the receiving workflow. Structured data can support further statistical and machine-learning analysis; that format alone does not validate a predictive model.
• Laboratory-calibrated upscaling: use selected reference measurements to develop property-specific models along the logged core, subject to suitable inputs, calibration coverage and validation. Predicted tracks remain clearly distinguished from measured laboratory results.

Statistical groups require geological interpretation; they are not automatically validated lithofacies. Grain-size indices and modelled mineralogy are derived outputs, not substitutes for direct reference measurements. These analyses are scoped separately from routine acquisition.

Geological interpretation

Smart reports can bring imagery, measurements and interpretations into a navigable review format. Reporting scope is agreed alongside the analytical programme, with the underlying quantitative data retained for further use.

Extend the programme with sedimentological interpretation. Core photographs, selected CoreDNA measurements and available CT imagery can be reviewed together to define lithotypes, pick bed boundaries and examine how beds stack. Interpretive comments record the evidence and areas of uncertainty.

Where suitable borehole images are available, the scope can include core-to-log alignment, core orientation and assessment of sedimentary dips. These depend on the quality and processing of the reference data; uncertain orientation or depth matches remain explicit rather than being presented as definitive results.

Deliverables can include integrated interpretation panels, lithotype and bed-boundary records, and agreed image or data exports. This is an additional interpretation workstream, scoped separately from routine CoreDNA acquisition.